Myopia Management

My 11 year old son was recommended to have myopia management by his optometrist to slow the growth of his eye through either CRT hard lenses (OrthoK) soft lenses (MySight), or atropine drops. We’re considering the soft or hard lenses since we’d rather not use the drops. Any recommendations, advice, experience in this would be appreciated. Which did you try for your child and did it work? How long did it take? What didn’t work or what would you not suggest? I understand everyone is different etc, but I can’t find much information on this as far as outcomes, pros/cons, so I thought I’d reach out to bpn. Its very expensive so I’m trying to get as much information before we decide on how to manage it. We are in the process of getting another opinion/evaluation and we have contacted UC Berkeley and UCSF myopia control clinic, but would like to hear others experience as well. 

Parent Replies

Parents, please Sign in to post a review on this page.
RE:
Myopia Management (May 5, 2025)

I recently asked a pediatric ophtalmologist about it. She said that the evidence on hard lenses is mixed, including based on her own observations with her patients. However the only thing that has been proven over and over again is that spending at least two hours outside everyday is the best way to slow down or potentially even reverse myopia in children/teens. You have to be diligent about it and potentially make lifestyle changes but apparently being exposed to natural light outdoors is the best and possibly the only way. Good luck! 

RE:
Myopia Management (May 5, 2025)

My daughter is 18 and graduating from high school this year. She used OrthoK lenses for myopia control for almost 10 years and we couldn't be happier with the program. She was seen at UC Berkeley. She first got glasses in 1st grade, and after 1 year, her eyesight had deteriorated so quickly, we were referred to the myopia clinic. The contacts were easy for her to use and because she chose the hard lenses, it meant she never had to worry about corrective lenses or glasses during the day. She wore them consistently, except when she went to sleepaway camp, and she decided to bring glasses instead. Now that she's older and not getting enough sleep reliably, she decided to switch to soft lenses, giving her the option of wearing contacts or glasses on a daily basis. Amazingly, after weaning off of her OrthoK last month, the doctors determined that her eyesight had not deteriorated AT ALL since second grade when she began wearing them. We probably saved money over the course of the program because her prescription didn't really change (we only replaced her OrthoK once) and the glasses we got her as backups were also only replaced once. I'm not sure if this is typical. 

RE:
Myopia Management (May 5, 2025)

My experience is slightly different and from a couple of decades ago, but may be a data point to consider. 


My eyes were -7.5 and -7.0 and I used RGP lenses regularly during the day time for about two or three years, and then I was going to go on a backpacking trip and asked for daily disposables so I don't have to worry about carrying solutions and cleaning my lenses. When I was being fitted for soft lenses they tested my vision, and my vision had improved to the -6.5 and -6.0 range due to reshaping of the cornea from the hard lenses. 

So my vote would be for the hard lenses, because it worked for me personally.

RE:
Myopia Management (May 5, 2025)

Hi, my kiddo (now 11 years old; will turn 12 in a couple months) has been on OrthoK for a little over a year and was on atropine drops for about a year and a half before that. The drops worked for awhile but then his prescription started inching up so we switched to OrthoK. We've been happy with the results so far with the hard lenses -- we just had another follow-up appt and his prescription hasn't changed at all. I have really bad myopia and I remember as a kid my prescription skyrocketed during my pre-teen and early teen years, so the fact that these treatments are available now is pretty wild.

The main thing with OrthoK (and with any lenses, obv) is putting them in and taking them off. I had to do both for my kid for the first, oh, 6-8 months. YMMV! (Our optometrist gave us a little plunger-like tool that makes suctioning them off the eyeball pretty easy.) OTC lubrication drops (*not* the medicated or red eye kind) can make the processes easier and more comfortable.

With OrthoK, we like that he doesn't have to wear anything (glasses or contacts) during the day when he's out and about, and now that he's older can be responsible for cleaning, soaking, washing out the lens case, etc.

FWIW, if you're still considering atropine treatment, my kid did have increased sensitivity to sunlight/bright lights so we ended up getting some snap-on sunglasses that went over his regular glasses for sunny days. Not the "coolest" look, and something to keep in mind if you go that route. Hope this is helpful.

RE:
Myopia Management (May 5, 2025)

We were in your shoes a couple of years ago and decided not to do the treatment. (I say "decided" but really it was more inertia—we felt unsure about all three options so didn't move forward, and months turned into years. Our optometrist did do regular checks through that time to monitor the progression every six months or so, and we might have changed course if it had suddenly gotten a lot worse, but thankfully it didn't.) Some of our concerns were that we didn't think our child would be consistent about using the atropine drops and didn't love the infection risk for overnight lens usage relying on a tween's care and cleaning. Compounding that was that all of the options were expensive, none were covered by our vision insurance, and at the time, the research on outcomes for all three treatments was very mixed. So...now our child is almost 14 and on the other side of the puberty growth spurt, but the myopia has remained more or less unchanged (much to our optometrist's surprise and our relief). Things may of course still shift since myopia can worsen through adolescence and into the early 20s, but the fact that it hasn't gotten worse over two years of rapid puberty growth apparently means that the odds are in our child's favor for the condition to remain mild. While hindsight is of course 20/20, we're glad that we didn't do the intervention (and it's tricky because if we had done it and this had been the result, that would have been considered successful treatment too). We did double down on the limited screen time and expanded outdoor time recommendations from the American Academy of Opthamology that they believe help prevent myopia from worsening, although again—I have no idea whether that had any impact. Just offering one anecdotal data point to consider. (I think talking with UC Berkeley's pediatric eye center is a great plan too since they specialize in treating this age.)

RE:
Myopia Management (May 5, 2025)

We have gone to the Myopia clinic so Berkeley for four years. Because of the responsibility and fine motor skills, contact lenses are not a good option right now. 

He's had atropine eye drops for several years and it seems to help. There's been no noticeable side effects, but he's always had lenses that turn into sunglasses when outside. 

He also has Hoya Miyosmart lenses for his glasses, which has also helped. These are not yet approved in the US so we order from Canada. It's very new and promising research.